COMMON ATTACK PATTERN ENUMERATION AND CLASSIFICATIONLive MITRE record

CAPEC-698

Install Malicious Extension

An adversary directly installs or tricks a user into installing a malicious extension into existing trusted software, with the goal of achieving a variety of negative technical impacts.

Abstraction

Detailed

Typical severity

High

Likelihood of attack

Medium

Understand the attack

What is this attack pattern?

An adversary directly installs or tricks a user into installing a malicious extension into existing trusted software, with the goal of achieving a variety of negative technical impacts.

Extended description

Many software applications allow users to install third-party software extensions/plugins that provide additional features and functionality. Adversaries can take advantage of this behavior to install malware on a system with relative ease. This may require the adversary compromising a system and then installing the malicious extension themself. An alternate approach entails masquerading the malicious extension as a legitimate extension. The adversary then convinces users to install the malicious component, via means such as social engineering, or simply waits for victims to unknowingly install the malware on their systems. Once the malicious extension has been installed, the adversary can achieve a variety of negative technical impacts such as obtaining sensitive information, executing unauthorized commands, observing/modifying network traffic, and more.

Execution flow

How does the attack proceed, step by step?

1

Explore

Identify target(s)

The adversary must first identify target software that allows for extensions/plugins and which they wish to exploit, such as a web browser or desktop application. To increase the attack space, this will often be popular software with a large user-base.
2

Experiment

Create malicious extension

Having identified a suitable target, the adversary crafts a malicious extension/plugin that can be installed by the underlying target software. This malware may be targeted to execute on specific operating systems or be operating system agnostic.
3

Exploit

Install malicious extension

The malicious extension/plugin is installed by the underlying target software and executes the adversary-created malware, resulting in a variety of negative technical impacts.

Techniques used

  • Adversary-Installed: Having already compromised the target system, the adversary simply installs the malicious extension/plugin themself.
  • User-Installed: The adversary tricks the user into installing the malicious extension/plugin, via means such as social engineering, or may upload the malware on a reputable extension/plugin hosting site and wait for unknowing victims to install the malicious component.

Requirements

What does the attack require?

Prerequisites

  • The adversary must craft malware based on the type of software and system(s) they intend to exploit.
  • If the adversary intends to install the malicious extension themself, they must first compromise the target machine via some other means.

Skills required

  • Medium: Ability to create malicious extensions that can exploit specific software applications and systems.
  • Medium: Optional: Ability to exploit target system(s) via other means in order to gain entry.

Resources required

Not stated in the MITRE record.

Impact

What does a successful attack lead to?

Read Data

Affected scopes: Confidentiality, Access Control

Modify Data

Affected scopes: Integrity, Access Control

Execute Unauthorized CommandsAlter Execution LogicGain Privileges

Affected scopes: Authorization, Access Control

Defence

How is it prevented and mitigated?

1
Only install extensions/plugins from official/verifiable sources.
2
Confirm extensions/plugins are legitimate and not malware masquerading as a legitimate extension/plugin.
3
Ensure the underlying software leveraging the extension/plugin (including operating systems) is up-to-date.
4
Implement an extension/plugin allow list, based on the given security policy.
5
If applicable, confirm extensions/plugins are properly signed by the official developers.
6
For web browsers, close sessions when finished to prevent malicious extensions/plugins from executing the the background.

Real world

MITRE example instances

Example instance 1Detail
In January 2018, Palo Alto's Unit 42 reported that a malicious Internet Information Services (IIS) extension they named RGDoor was used to create a backdoor into several Middle Eastern government organizations, as well as a financial institution and an educational institution. This malware was used in conjunction with the TwoFace webshell and allowed the adversaries to upload/download files and execute unauthorized commands. [ REF-740 ]
Example instance 2Detail
In December 2018, it was reported that North Korea-based APT Kimusky (also known as Velvet Chollima) infected numerous legitimate academic organizations within the U.S., many specializing in biomedical engineering, with a malicious Google Chrome extension. Dubbed "Operation STOLEN PENCIL", the attack entailed conducting spear-phishing attacks to trick victims into installing a malicious PDF reader named "Auto Font Manager". Once installed, the malware allowed adversaries to steal cookies and site passwords, as well as forward emails from some compromised accounts. [ REF-741 ]
CAPEC-698: Install Malicious Extension — DayBreach Saldırı Sözlüğü · DayBreach