Langflow: PythonREPLComponent executes unsandboxed Python code, enabling authenticated RCE and privilege escalation
CVSS score
9.9
EPSS probability
%0.8
Risk score
0.1
Published
5 d ago
Resmî kaynaklarda yeterli kanıt bulunamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Impact on My Inventory
Only the personal products you have added to your account are assessed; an organisation's inventory does not appear here.
Checking session…
Vulnerability description
DayBreach CVE AI Research
CVE-2026-10561 has vendor, distribution, patch and security-source records on file. We can compare them and prepare an explanation linked to the evidence.
### Summary Langflow's built-in Python interpreter components — `PythonREPLComponent` (Python Interpreter) and the legacy `PythonREPLToolComponent` (Python REPL Tool) — executed arbitrary user- or model-supplied Python code inside flows without effective sandboxing. Because the code ran in-process with the privileges of the Langflow service, any **authenticated** user who could edit and run a flow could achieve remote code execution and, from there, escalate privileges to superuser (e.g. by opening a database session and flipping `is_superuser`) or compromise the host. **This issue is fixed as of 1.10.1**, with additional hardening through 1.12.3. See *Remediation* below. ### Affected - **Package:** `langflow` (PyPI), and the underlying `lfx` package that ships the component. - **Vulnerable versions:** `< 1.10.1`. - **Patched:** `1.10.1` (core fix). Upgrade to `>= 1.12.3` for the complete hardening series. ### Details The root cause is **code injection** (CWE-94/CWE-95): the component passed raw input to LangChain's `PythonREPL`, which is explicitly *not* a security sandbox. Two distinct weaknesses existed before 1.10.1: 1. **Unrestricted builtins (default deployments).** `get_globals()` built the `exec` globals from the `global_imports` allow-list but never set `__builtins__`. CPython's `exec()` then auto-injected the full `builtins` module, leaving `__import__`, `open`, `eval`, `exec` and the whole import machinery reachable regardless of the allow-list — e.g. `__import__("os").system(...)` or `__import__("subprocess").check_output([...])`. This made the "only modules in Global Imports can be used" guarantee false, and it applied even with the **default** configuration (`allow_custom_components=True`). 2. **No server-policy gate (locked-down deployments).** Even a deployment hardened with `allow_custom_components=False` could still run interpreter code, because the components did not consult that policy before executing. Both let an authenticated user run the reported PoC, which opens a DB session and sets `is_superuser = True` on their account, or writes to the filesystem / runs OS commands with the service's privileges. ### PoC (as reported) 1. Authenticate as a normal user. 2. Create a flow with the `PythonREPLComponent`. 3. Execute Python that imports Langflow internals and elevates the account: ```python import asyncio from sqlmodel import select from langflow.services.database.models.user.model import User from langflow.services.deps import session_scope async def escalate(): async with session_scope() as session: stmt = select(User).where(User.username == 'testuser') user = (await session.exec(stmt)).first() if user: user.is_superuser = True session.add(user) await session.commit() asyncio.run(escalate()) ``` ### Impact Any authenticated user could: - Execute arbitrary Python / OS commands with the Langflow service's privileges (RCE). - Escalate their own account to superuser via direct database access. - Read/modify data and configuration, and potentially pivot to the underlying host. ### Remediation Upgrade to **Langflow 1.10.1 or later** (preferably **>= 1.12.3**). The interpreter components were hardened with layered, defense-in-depth controls, applied in `run_python_repl()` before any code is executed: - **Restricted builtins** — `get_globals()` injects a curated `safe_builtins()` mapping, removing `__import__`, `eval`, `exec`, `compile`, `open`, `input`, `globals`/`locals`/`vars`, `getattr`/`setattr`, etc. (#13397) - **AST validation** — `validate_code_safety()` rejects inline `import`/`from ... import`, dunder/escape-gadget attribute access (`__class__`, `__subclasses__`, `__globals__`, frame/traceback introspection) and format-string dunder traversal. (#13397) - **Server-policy gate** — `ensure_code_execution_enabled()` refuses to run when `allow_custom_components=False` or `block_code_interpreter_components=True`, and **fails closed** if the settings stack cannot be resolved. (#13700 — this advisory — and #14375) - **Allow-listed module proxies** — imported modules are exposed via a proxy that blocks reaching `sys.modules["os"]` through a module's transitive import graph. (#15198) - **Optional hardware isolation** — configure `LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKEND` to run interpreter code in an isolated microVM instead of in-process. (#14400) Upstream fix references: #13397, #13700 (carries this GHSA), #14375, #14400, #15198. ### Hardening recommendations for operators - Keep Langflow updated (>= 1.12.3). - For locked-down deployments, set `LANGFLOW_ALLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS=false` (or `LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS=true`) to disable the interpreter entirely. - For deployments that must run untrusted code, configure `LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKEND` for microVM isolation. - Run the Langflow service as an unprivileged user with least-privilege database credentials.
IMPACT: Affected Products and Software
Affected Products
The following products are affected by CVE-2026-10561 vulnerability. Where our threat engine knows the exact affected versions, they are listed below.
| ID | VENDOR | PRODUCT | ACTION |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pypi | langflow | View |
RED HAT CSAF/VEX: Product Impact Check
SCORING: CVSS from Multiple Sources
CVSS Scores
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System is a standardised framework for assessing the severity of vulnerabilities in software and systems. We collect and display CVSS scores from several sources for each CVE.
| SCORE | VERSION | SEVERITY | VECTOR | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9 | CVSS 3.x | — | Vector not published | GitHub Advisory |
| 0.0 | CVSS 4.0 | — | Vector not published | GitHub Advisory |
Patch and Remediation Guide
Solution & Remediation Advisory
İncelenen resmî kaynaklarda yama durumu doğrulanamadı. Bu sonuç “yama yok” anlamına gelmez.
Public exploit and active exploitation status
Verified exploit intelligence
No verified public PoC, exploit repository or Metasploit module has been found for this CVE yet.
Weakness Classification and Attack Patterns (CWE & CAPEC)
CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration
While CVE identifies specific instances of vulnerabilities, CWE categorises the common flaws or weaknesses that can lead to vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-10561 is associated with the following CWEs:
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) stores attack patterns, which are descriptions of the common attributes and approaches employed by adversaries to exploit the CVE-2026-10561 weaknesses.
Attack Vector and Accessibility
Official Sources and Advisories
Similar Vulnerabilities
MLflow: Unauthenticated full-read SSRF in webhook delivery: _validate_webhook_url bypassed via unvalidated HTTP redirects (and DNS rebinding)
SQL injection in Litellm
netlicensing-mcp: REST Path Traversal Bypasses Token Redaction
Starlette has missing Host header validation that poisons request.url.path, bypassing path-based security checks
ESPHome Device Builder Dashboard: Unauthenticated dashboard access via the HA add-on ingress site bound to all interfaces
Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): DNS-rebinding SSRF filter bypass in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (nltk.download / nltk.data.load) defeats ENFORCE mode
Get this vulnerability through the API
Affected products, version ranges, exploitation status and patch information in a single request, with a free key.
curl -H "x-api-key: $DAYBREACH_API_KEY" \ "https://api.enginteksut.com.tr/api/v1/intel/cves/CVE-2026-10561"